Pugetbench actually gives the edge to the Ryzen 5 5600X in the export score by a commanding 21 percent. AMD’s Ryzen CPUs don’t ship with integrated graphics. That lead seems to come largely from the integrated graphics cores in the Intel CPU. Much of the advantage-which is indeed real-comes from the live playback score, where the 12th-gen Core i5 has a 92 percent advantage over the Ryzen 5. The overall score for PugetBench gives a downright shocking 64 percent performance lead to the Core i5-12600K over the Ryzen 5 5600X-but there’s more nuance to it. Premiere Pro, unlike Photoshop, can use far more CPU cores. To gauge performance there, we use Pugetbench for Premiere Pro, which measures performance in the popular video editor. Other than photo editing, video editing can be one of the most demanding tasks on a PC. That doesn’t surprise us, as Lightoom Classic tends to use more CPU cores than Photoshop. In the batch processing task that leans more on Lightroom Classic performance, the 12th-gen Core i5 opens its lead to 7 percent. Looking at the sub scores, we basically see a tie within the margin of error for the Image Retouch test, which is mostly Photoshop editing performance. Procyon 2.0’s overall score sees both chips actually close up a little, but the Core i5-12600K still edges the Ryzen 5 5600X by three percent. The benchmark scripts Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom Classic with several photo tasks. Geekbench is fun to shriek at people about on Twitter, but for something closer to reality we like to look at how fast the CPUs run actual applications, so first up is Procyon 2.0’s Photo Editing benchmark. So if your idea of a good time is compressing or decompressing files with 7-Zip, reach for Ryzen. We see the 12th-gen Core i5 is actually 13 percent slower in single-threaded compression and 10 percent slower in single-threaded decompression. We suspect 7-Zip either is sensitive to the latency of DDR5 or simply isn’t optimized for Alder Lake though because the single-threaded performance provides the first glimpse of a task where Ryzen is faster. If you did, however, the winner would be the Core i5-12600K, which pulls in a 7 percent advantage in decompression performance and 5 percent in compression performance over the Ryzen 5 5600X. 7-Zip is free, wonderful, and we recommend you check it out, but its built in benchmark is mostly academic since we’ve never seen it use all 16 threads of a CPU to compress or decompress a file. Moving on to the exhilarating world of compressing and decompressing your files, we use 7-Zip’s built-in benchmark to gauge that performance. To see the image above (or any benchmark charts in this article) at full resolution, right-click on them and select “open image in new tab.” ASRock's Z690 Steel Legend on the other hand, is more of an entry-level/mid-range platform instead.Longer bars indicate better performance. We aren’t sure what exactly is going on here, but it's safe to assume the Z690 Extreme is automatically tuning the 13600K’s power limits higher or it is increasing the duration of the turbo boost limit (if there are any) since it is - after all, Asus’ flagship motherboard designed for overclocking. The ASRock results underperform by a little bit in the single-threaded results with a score of 1,980, but the performance disparity increases a lot more in the multi-threaded benchmark results with a score of 14,425 - an 11% reduction compared to the Z690 Extreme. The Z690 Extreme scored the highest of the two with a single-threaded Geekbench 5 result of 2,012 points and a multi-threaded score of 16,054. Harukaze shared two 13600K benchmarks, one running the chip on an Asus ROG Maximum Z690 Extreme and another with the ASRock Z690 Steel Legend WiFi. So with both benchmarks backing each other up, these performance numbers could be legitimate estimations of the 13600K’s real-world synthetic performance, assuming clock speeds don’t change. This isn’t the first time we’ve seen this happen, a few days ago we reported on an engineering sample 13600K nearly matching the 5950X in CInebench R23 and in CPU-Z.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |